Rubrics For Science Assignment For 2nd

REFERENCES

HeidiAndrade. 2005. “Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.” College Teaching53 (1): 27–30.

HeidiAndrade, and YingDu. 2005. “Student Perspectives on Rubric-Referenced Assessment.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation10 (3).

PaulBlack, and DylanWiliam. 1998. “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment.” Phi Delta Kappan80 (2): 139–48.

College Board. 2004. . Report of the National Commission on Writing, available at http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/writingcom/writing-ticket-to-work.pdf

SamDillon. 2004. “.”

HeidiGoodrich. 1997. “Understanding rubrics.” Educational Leadership54 (4): 14–17.

JohnHafner, and PattiHafner. 2003. “Quantitative Analysis of the Rubric as an Assessment Tool: An Empirical Study of Student Peer-Group Rating.” International Journal of Science Education25 (12): 1509–528.

KathleenMontgomery. 2000. “Classroom Rubrics: Systematizing What Teachers Do Naturally.” Clearing House73 (6): 324–29.

LynnetteNoblitt, Diane E.Vance, and Michelle L. DePoySmith. 2010. “A Comparison of Case Study and Traditional Teaching Methods for Improvement of Oral Communication and Critical-Thinking Skills,” Journal of College Science Teaching39 (5): 26–33.

MariyaOmelicheva. 2009. “Assessment of Learning and for Learning: Testing the Effectiveness and Accuracy of the Standard Scoring Instruments.” In Assessment in Political Science, eds. K.Hamann, J.Ishiyama, and M.Deardorff, 163–80. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, Assessment in Political Science.

AndrewPennock. 2011. “The Case for Using Policy Writing in Undergraduate Political Science Courses.” PS: Political Science and Politics44 (1): 141–46.

James W.Popham1997. “What's Wrong—and What's Right—with Rubrics.” Educational Leadership55 (2): 72–75.

SallyRoever, and PaulManna. 2005. “‘Could You Explain My Grade?’ The Pedagogical and Administrative Virtues of Grading Sheets.” PS: Political Science and Politics39 (2): 317–20.

MaryRucker, and StephanieThompson. 2003. “Assessing Student Learning Outcomes: An Investigation of the Relationship among Feedback Measures.” College Student Journal37 (3): 400–05.

BruceSaddler, and HeidiAndrade. 2004. “The Writing Rubric.” Educational Leadership62 (2): 48–52.

Dannelle D.Stevens, and Antonia J.Levi. 2005. Introduction to Rubrics. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Paul E.Sum, and Steven AndrewLight. 2010. “Assessing Student Learning Outcomes and Documenting Success through a Capstone Course.” PS: Political Science and Politics43 (2): 523–31.

Charles D.Taylor2011. “Budget Conflict in Banjo Crossing: Using a Classroom Simulation to Teach the Politics of Budgeting.” PS: Political Science and Politics44 (3): 641–47.

RobinTierney, and MarielleSimon. 2004. “What's Still Wrong with Rubrics: Focusing on the Consistency of Performance Criteria across Scale Levels.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation9 (2).

Christina M.Truemper2004. “Using Scoring Rubrics to Facilitate Assessment and Evaluation of Graduate-Level Nursing Students.” Journal of Nursing Education43 (12): 562–64.

EricTurley, and ChrisGallagher. 2008. “On the Uses of Rubrics: Reframing the Great Rubric Debate,” English Journal97 (4): 87–93.

Linda PayneYoung. 2009. “Imagine Creating Rubrics That Develop Creativity,” English Journal99 (2): 74–80.

Science Rubrics

Exemplars scoring rubrics are excellent tools for assessing student work.

Exemplars science material includes standards-based rubrics that define what work meets a standard, and allows teachers (and students) to distinguish between different levels of performance. Exemplars rubrics have four levels of performance: Novice, Apprentice, Practitioner (meets the standard) and Expert.

Exemplars uses two types of rubrics:

  • Standards-Based Assessment Rubrics are used by teachers to assess student work in science. (Exemplars material includes both a general science rubric as well as task-specific rubrics with each investigation.)

Students can also use our Assessment Rubrics (and annotated anchor papers) to compare their work to during peer- and self-appraisals. This process demonstrates success as well as offers opportunities for refinement. Based on student performance, teaching and learning strategies can be adjusted.

Here's What People Are Saying

I have used Exemplars for the past 15 years, and I have yet to find any other resource that compares to it.

D. Reynolds

Curriculum Specialist

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *